

Model comparison
Ford Ranger vs Toyota Tacoma
Depreciation, used prices, ownership costs and model-year data compared
See the comparisonThe Ford Ranger returned to the U.S. market as a midsize pickup for the 2019 model year.
Market context: The cohort covers the first two model years of the U.S.-market return.

Compare With
Open a side-by-side comparison of five-year value retention, depreciation by model year, used asking prices, repair costs, MPG and safety data.


Model comparison
Depreciation, used prices, ownership costs and model-year data compared
See the comparison

Model comparison
Depreciation, used prices, ownership costs and model-year data compared
See the comparison

Model comparison
Depreciation, used prices, ownership costs and model-year data compared
See the comparisonAt a glance
Biggest drop
2020→2019
+6.9% in one year
| Model year | Depreciation from MSRP |
|---|---|
| 2020 | 17.9% |
| 2019 | 24.8% |
Based on 400 real used-car listings. Each listing's price is adjusted to a standard 12,000 mi/year for its age and compared to the vehicle's original MSRP; figures reflect a 5% asking-to-sale estimate.
Estimated value of a typical Ford Ranger as it ages, from a ~$28,460 new price.
| Age | Retained | Est. value | Lost that year | Total lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 yr | 100% | $28,460 | — | −$0 |
| 2 yrs | 100% | $28,460 | — | −$0 |
| 3 yrs | 100% | $28,460 | — | −$0 |
| 4 yrs | 95% | $26,940 | −$1,520 | −$1,520 |
| 5 yrs | 88% | $24,984 | −$1,956 | −$3,476 |
| 6 yrs | 81% | $23,170 | −$1,814 | −$5,290 |
| 7 yrs | 76% | $21,488 | −$1,682 | −$6,972 |
| 8 yrs | 70% | $19,928 | −$1,560 | −$8,532 |
Interactive tool
Estimate a used Ranger's value from its year and mileage, using our depreciation model.
$21,500
about typical mileage
At 84,000 miles (about typical for a 7-year-old car, ~84,000 mi). Estimate only — actual value depends on condition, trim, options, and local demand.
Thinking about a Ford Ranger? It's an early resale snapshot with too little model-year history for a long-term verdict. Favor the XL trim for the best resale, and always pull a vehicle-history report before buying.
The 2020-to-2019 transition is where the Ranger bleeds the most value, dropping 6.9% points in one year.
Trim matters: the XL holds its value best (about 13.1% average depreciation), while the Lariat gives up the most (around 25.5%). Choosing the right trim can be worth thousands at resale.
Share of original MSRP retained, averaged across model years.
Mileage profile across 400 listings.
Over 100k mi
24.8%
Over 150k mi
2.8%
Highest mileage
207,204 mi
Price at 120k+ mi
$17,408
Roughly 24.8% of listed Ford Rangers have already crossed 100,000 miles — most on the market are still relatively low-mileage.
The XL retains the most value, depreciating about 13.1% on average across model years in our data. Trim choice can swing resale by thousands of dollars over a few years, because desirable trims stay in demand on the used market while stripped-down or niche trims sell at a discount. It's also worth comparing the trim premium new versus used — a pricier trim sometimes depreciates enough to become the smarter used buy. If you expect to resell, the XL is the safer bet; if you're keeping the car long-term, buy the trim with the features you actually want and worry less about resale.
Depreciation is computed from 400 real used-car listings. Each listing's asking price is normalized to a standard 12,000 miles per year for the vehicle's age, adjusted by a 5% asking-to-sale estimate, and compared against the original base MSRP for that VIN's trim. Headline 1/3/5-year figures reflect a smoothed retention curve fitted across all model years (the typical trajectory); individual years in the table above can run above or below it with market conditions. Full methodology. Updated August 2026.