Head-To-Head Resale Comparison
BMW X1 vs Hyundai Kona: resale value, depreciation and costs
We compared 1,511 listing observations from the 2026 market cycle to see which model retains more value, costs less used, and brings the stronger ownership numbers.
Hyundai Kona
Full model guideThe Short Answer
One market cycle, incomplete five-year evidence
Both models were observed in the 2026 market cycle, but at least one side does not include the five-year cohort required for a defensible smoothed retention score. CarResaleValue does not fill that gap with a synthetic rank. Use the shared model-year rows, used prices, fuel economy, repairs and safety evidence instead.
Comparison Scorecard
The numbers that change the decision
Green cells mark a measurable advantage, not an overall verdict. Price and coverage are shown without declaring a winner because the right tradeoff depends on your budget and the exact vehicle.
| Metric | BMW X1 | Hyundai Kona |
|---|---|---|
| 5-year value retainedSmoothed estimate in the 2026 market cycle | Not available | Not available |
| 5-year depreciationEstimated share of original value lost | Not available | Not available |
| Average used asking priceMedian asking prices averaged across covered model years | $14,171 | $14,745 |
| Average original MSRPOriginal sticker prices averaged across covered years | $40,400 | $24,916 |
| Latest combined fuel economy2020 BMW X1 vs 2020 Hyundai Kona | 27 MPG | 28 MPG |
| Average annual repair costRepairPal model-level estimate | Not available | Not available |
| RepairPal reliability ratingOut of 5.0 | Not available | Not available |
| Latest NHTSA overall rating2020 vs 2020 | 5 / 5 stars | 5 / 5 stars |
| Listing observationsEvidence behind the model-level curves | 957 | 554 |
Year By Year
Compare overlapping model years
These 3shared model years make age-matched shopping easier. Depreciation compares each year's normalized asking price with its original MSRP.
Buyer Fit
Which one should you buy?
Start with the tradeoff you care about, then verify the exact year, trim, mileage and service history. A model-level advantage can disappear when two individual used cars are not equivalent.
Choose the BMW X1 if...
- Its average median used asking price is $574 lower across the covered model years.
- You found a specific example with the stronger year, trim, mileage, condition or service history; those details can outweigh a model-level average.
- Its $14,171 average median asking price fits your budget after you check the same-year rows below.
Choose the Hyundai Kona if...
- You are targeting one of the 3 shared model years where it posted lower measured depreciation than the BMW X1.
- Fuel economy matters: the latest covered model year is rated at 28 MPG combined, 1 MPG higher.
- You found a specific example with the stronger year, trim, mileage, condition or service history; those details can outweigh a model-level average.
Beyond The Score
How these models fit the used market
Resale value is only one part of the choice. Segment role, supply and the mix of years on sale help explain why two similarly priced vehicles can depreciate differently.
BMW X1
The BMW X1 is a subcompact luxury crossover offered in rear-biased first-generation and front-drive-based second-generation forms, with sDrive and xDrive variants represented.
Market context: The sample crosses the complete 2016 platform change from E84 to F48, making generation the first comparison point before drivetrain, option packages, mileage, service history, and condition.
Hyundai Kona
The Hyundai Kona is a subcompact crossover sold with front- or all-wheel drive and, in some years, an electric variant.
Market context: The cohort covers its first three U.S. model years.
Go Deeper
Open the full model-year research
Compare trims, mileage, recalls, fuel costs and current listing examples before deciding on one specific car.
Keep Comparing
More comparisons for your shortlist
See how the BMW X1 and Hyundai Kona stack up against other close alternatives using the same resale-value framework.
Model comparison
Chevrolet Trax vs Hyundai Kona
Depreciation, used prices, ownership costs and model-year data compared
See the comparison
Model comparison
BMW X1 vs Subaru Crosstrek
Depreciation, used prices, ownership costs and model-year data compared
See the comparisonModel comparison
Hyundai Kona vs Subaru Crosstrek
Depreciation, used prices, ownership costs and model-year data compared
See the comparisonFrequently Asked Questions
Which holds its value better, the BMW X1 or Hyundai Kona?
Both models use the 2026 observation cycle, but at least one does not have the observed five-year cohort required for a model-level retention score. CarResaleValue therefore does not declare a five-year winner or extrapolate beyond the available evidence. Compare the overlapping model-year depreciation rows, asking prices, repair indicators, fuel economy and safety data, then verify the exact year, trim, mileage and condition in current local listings.
Is the BMW X1 or Hyundai Kona cheaper to buy used?
Across the model years in this dataset, the BMW X1 has the lower average median asking price at $14,171, about $574 below the Hyundai Kona average. That broad average is a starting point, not a like-for-like quote, because each model can have a different year range, trim mix and mileage distribution. The year-by-year table is the better place to compare vehicles of the same age before checking listings near you.
Which is less expensive to maintain, the BMW X1 or Hyundai Kona?
The available model data does not provide a complete annual repair-cost estimate for both vehicles, so this page does not name a maintenance-cost winner. Use the RepairPal ratings where shown, review recalls and complaints in each model-year guide, ask for service records, and budget for an independent pre-purchase inspection. Age, mileage, powertrain and previous maintenance usually matter more than a single broad reliability score.
How does CarResaleValue compare the BMW X1 and Hyundai Kona?
CarResaleValue normalizes observed used-car asking prices to a standard 12,000 miles per year, applies a 5% asking-to-sale adjustment, and compares the result with original MSRP references. A smoothed retention curve produces the five-year estimate when the data contains an observed five-year cohort. This page combines 1,511 listing observations across 9 model-year records, then adds EPA fuel economy, NHTSA safety data and RepairPal ownership indicators where available.
Comparison methodology
This page combines 1,511 listing observations across 9 model-year records. Asking prices are mileage-normalized to 12,000 miles per year, adjusted by a 5% asking-to-sale estimate, and compared with original MSRP references. Five-year figures use a smoothed curve only when an observed five-year cohort exists. EPA, NHTSA and RepairPal fields are shown independently and may cover different model years. Read the full CarResaleValue methodology. You can also browse the suv resale value ranking.