Head-To-Head Resale Comparison
Audi e-tron GT vs Kia Optima: resale value, depreciation and costs
We compared 1,480 listing observations from the 2026 market cycle to see which model retains more value, costs less used, and brings the stronger ownership numbers.
Kia Optima
Full model guideThe Short Answer
One market cycle, incomplete five-year evidence
Both models were observed in the 2026 market cycle, but at least one side does not include the five-year cohort required for a defensible smoothed retention score. CarResaleValue does not fill that gap with a synthetic rank. Use the shared model-year rows, used prices, fuel economy, repairs and safety evidence instead.
Comparison Scorecard
The numbers that change the decision
Green cells mark a measurable advantage, not an overall verdict. Price and coverage are shown without declaring a winner because the right tradeoff depends on your budget and the exact vehicle.
| Metric | Audi e-tron GT | Kia Optima |
|---|---|---|
| 5-year value retainedSmoothed estimate in the 2026 market cycle | Not available | Not available |
| 5-year depreciationEstimated share of original value lost | Not available | Not available |
| Average used asking priceMedian asking prices averaged across covered model years | $86,166 | $10,913 |
| Average original MSRPOriginal sticker prices averaged across covered years | $148,246 | $25,699 |
| Latest combined fuel economy2024 Audi e-tron GT vs 2020 Kia Optima | 85 MPG | 27 MPG |
| Average annual repair costRepairPal model-level estimate | Not available | Not available |
| RepairPal reliability ratingOut of 5.0 | Not available | Not available |
| Latest NHTSA overall ratingLatest rated year vs 2020 | Not available | 5 / 5 stars |
| Listing observationsEvidence behind the model-level curves | 317 | 1,163 |
Buyer Fit
Which one should you buy?
Start with the tradeoff you care about, then verify the exact year, trim, mileage and service history. A model-level advantage can disappear when two individual used cars are not equivalent.
Choose the Audi e-tron GT if...
- Fuel economy matters: the latest covered model year is rated at 85 MPG combined, 58 MPG higher.
- You found a specific example with the stronger year, trim, mileage, condition or service history; those details can outweigh a model-level average.
- Its $86,166 average median asking price fits your budget after you check the same-year rows below.
Choose the Kia Optima if...
- Its average median used asking price is $75,254 lower across the covered model years.
- You found a specific example with the stronger year, trim, mileage, condition or service history; those details can outweigh a model-level average.
- Its $10,913 average median asking price fits your budget after you check the same-year rows below.
Beyond The Score
How these models fit the used market
Resale value is only one part of the choice. Segment role, supply and the mix of years on sale help explain why two similarly priced vehicles can depreciate differently.
Audi e-tron GT
Audi e-tron GT coverage spans 2022-2026.
Kia Optima
The Kia Optima is a midsize sedan sold with conventional, turbocharged, hybrid, and plug-in hybrid configurations during the observed model years.
Market context: Six continuous cohort years cover the fourth-generation Optima without mixing in the K5 successor that adopted a new U.S. name for 2021.
Go Deeper
Open the full model-year research
Compare trims, mileage, recalls, fuel costs and current listing examples before deciding on one specific car.
Keep Comparing
More comparisons for your shortlist
See how the Audi e-tron GT and Kia Optima stack up against other close alternatives using the same resale-value framework.
Model comparison
Chevrolet Malibu vs Kia Optima
Depreciation, used prices, ownership costs and model-year data compared
See the comparison
Model comparison
Hyundai Sonata vs Kia Optima
Depreciation, used prices, ownership costs and model-year data compared
See the comparison
Model comparison
Ford Fusion vs Kia Optima
Depreciation, used prices, ownership costs and model-year data compared
See the comparisonFrequently Asked Questions
Which holds its value better, the Audi e-tron GT or Kia Optima?
Both models use the 2026 observation cycle, but at least one does not have the observed five-year cohort required for a model-level retention score. CarResaleValue therefore does not declare a five-year winner or extrapolate beyond the available evidence. Compare the overlapping model-year depreciation rows, asking prices, repair indicators, fuel economy and safety data, then verify the exact year, trim, mileage and condition in current local listings.
Is the Audi e-tron GT or Kia Optima cheaper to buy used?
Across the model years in this dataset, the Kia Optima has the lower average median asking price at $10,913, about $75,254 below the Audi e-tron GT average. That broad average is a starting point, not a like-for-like quote, because each model can have a different year range, trim mix and mileage distribution. The year-by-year table is the better place to compare vehicles of the same age before checking listings near you.
Which is less expensive to maintain, the Audi e-tron GT or Kia Optima?
The available model data does not provide a complete annual repair-cost estimate for both vehicles, so this page does not name a maintenance-cost winner. Use the RepairPal ratings where shown, review recalls and complaints in each model-year guide, ask for service records, and budget for an independent pre-purchase inspection. Age, mileage, powertrain and previous maintenance usually matter more than a single broad reliability score.
How does CarResaleValue compare the Audi e-tron GT and Kia Optima?
CarResaleValue normalizes observed used-car asking prices to a standard 12,000 miles per year, applies a 5% asking-to-sale adjustment, and compares the result with original MSRP references. A smoothed retention curve produces the five-year estimate when the data contains an observed five-year cohort. This page combines 1,480 listing observations across 11 model-year records, then adds EPA fuel economy, NHTSA safety data and RepairPal ownership indicators where available.
Comparison methodology
This page combines 1,480 listing observations across 11 model-year records. Asking prices are mileage-normalized to 12,000 miles per year, adjusted by a 5% asking-to-sale estimate, and compared with original MSRP references. Five-year figures use a smoothed curve only when an observed five-year cohort exists. EPA, NHTSA and RepairPal fields are shown independently and may cover different model years. Read the full CarResaleValue methodology. You can also browse the sedan resale value ranking.